Exam 1
Sociology 2200 with Hermsen at University of Missouri- Columbia
About this deck
Textbook:
Categorically Unequal: The American Stratification System
Inequality and Society: Social Science Perspectives on Social StratificationCreated: 2011-10-06
Size: 48 flashcards
Views: 34
About StudyBlue
Naj
Sign up (free) to study this.
-what are the rewards we calue most?
- what we value in US migh tbe different than what other countries value (money, fame, attractiveness)
-focus on individualism
-merit or acheivment
-equal oppurtunity
-"you get what you deserve"
-equal opportunity not equal outcome
-inequality is relatively stable: change occurs slowly
-change reflects shifts in dominant ideologies of inequality
-we have to learn to think differently
-one social group expropriates a resource produced by another social group and prevents them from realizing the full value of their effort in producing the resource
-ex: gender wage gap, paying immigrants less
-one social group restricts access to a scarce resource through outright denial or by exercising monopoly control
-socially defined process of exclusion
-ex: educational success is hoarded in wealthy areas, gay marriage
-class is primary driver of inequality
-based on RELATIONS of production
-classes are always in conflict
-anyone who sells labor=worker/proletariat
-anyone who buys labor for profit=capitalist/bourgeoisie
-inequality is the competitive struglle over limited resources
-one's place in society is dteremined by the combo of class, status, and party
-
-how one gets their income and how much income they make defines social class
-groups with common market situation (how they earn money and how much they earn) that also share common mobility patterns
-class conflict is not inherent
-Weber- no because individuals may see identity based more stronly in status or party affiliation
-Marx- yes classes are constantly in conflict and their interests are contantly conflicting
-system of dispositions through which we perceive, judge, and act in the world
-hasn't kept up with inflation so it is now worth less than it was 30 years ago
-applies primarily to teenagers
-does not explain growing wages at top of distribution
aspirational gap
wealthy people dont have to gove as much back as they did
-government on the shoulders of middle-class families
-if we aren't going to tax the richest part of the population then we have to sacrifice things (funding for schools, roads, police)
-increased fro all income groups
-rising tide lifts all boats
-eglatarian capitalism
-trend shows growth until recent recession
-large increase for top (whites and asains)
-little change for middle and bottom (blacks and hispanics)
-declined
-rising tide lift all boats
-eglatarian capitalism
-increased
-growing share of income to those at top, declining to those at bottom
-known as the great u turn
-relaitve mobility did occur, but less then before 1970
-shows increasingly rigid class structure
-fewer rags to riches stories
-harder to move from bottom
-declining intergenerational mobility
-basic needs met for most in society
-initial stage of consumer society
-lots of public spending on services and infrastructure
-even more spending on consumer goods
-aspirational spending
-families adapt to aspirational gap by working more hours, having wives work, and credit cards
-less support for public spending
-decline in share of workers covered by unions
-no other institution holds firms accountable for distribution of parts
-shift in the industrial base from manufacturing to service jobs
-limits good jobs available to less educated workers
-impacts union base
-threat of job loss motivates workers to take lower pay
-supple of workers at the low end of the income distribution is greater than the demand for their work
-technology replaces labor-reduces demand for the skill of blue-collar work
-rising use of technology increase demand for "symbolic analysists" to manage information technology
-change in the immigrants coming to the US with more low-skill workers competing for low wage jobs
-immigrants cannot demand workplace rights so are expolited by employers with low pay
-trade balance does NOT favor US anymore
-the US imports more good than it exports
-less demand for US goods and services, hence less demand for the labor of US workers
-sets off chain reaction of industrial restructuring, immigration, deunionization, and great inequality
-Americans want lots of goods so goods must be relatively inexpensive
-import goods from countries with cheap labor
-most wealth today come from high salaries in the labor market
-highest paid workers (CEO's) make much mroe $$ than average worker
-americans show no resistance to the change
-the situation is unique to US-do not see patterns in Europe
-historical decline in the tax rate assesssed on the highest earners so not much difference in tax rate between family making $50k and that making $25mil a year
-corporate taz rates hace also declined and now a smaller share of government revenue comes from corporations
About this deck
Textbook:
Categorically Unequal: The American Stratification System
Inequality and Society: Social Science Perspectives on Social StratificationCreated: 2011-10-06
Size: 48 flashcards
Views: 34
About StudyBlue
Naj