Property
Law 777 with Sutton at Arizona State University - Tempe
About this deck
Created: 2011-06-29
Size: 168 flashcards
Views: 172
About StudyBlue
Dennis
Sign up (free) to study this.
The worst F***ing subject on the Bar :)
NOTE: This is a test card but it is also a correct answer from my perspective.
Title to land may be acquired without consent of the landowner by adverse possession if the following elements cane be established by the party seeking to claim title. (EAO uses HELUVA): Hostile (on land w/ no right to be there), Exclusive (excluding others), Lasting (or statutory period - 10 yrs in AZ, 20 at CL), Uninterrupted (kind of continued use the owner would make), Visible (used in a way to put others on notice) & Actual (by the claimant or proxy).
Adverse possessor acquires title only to the land actively possessed.
E.g., if the AP only uses 1-2 acres, that is what the AP would get.
Unless there is Constructive Adverse Possession.
AP acquires title to both the surface and sub-surface unless the sub-surface rights were transferred prior to the entry by the AP.
Note: this is based on the state of title at the time the AP takes possession.
AP acquires both thepresent and future rights, unless the future interest rights were transferred prior to the entry by the AP.
Ex: One year after AP enters land, the true owner conveys a future interest in the land to R. If the AP remains in possession for the statutory period R's futre interest terminates (as long as the interest was not divided up before AP, the Ad Possessor takes Fee Simple Absolute).
The statute of limitations does not begin to run if the true owner was under some disability to sue when the cause of action first accrued. Typical disabilities are minority (under 18 - also called infant), imprisonment, and insanity.
NOTE: If more than one disability, wait for last of disabilities to be remedied to "start clock"
Before the statutory period ends, the AP can bring an action in ejectment and seek damages against anyone who enters/injures the property, but not against the owner.
(This makes sense - can't really sue the owner before title is acquired - the land belongs to the owner.)
A Land Sale Contract
Note: Title to land can be acquired by gift, devise, or inheritance, in which case, a land sale contract is not required.
Before the closing. After closing, the buyer must rely on any express covenant of title or other contract defenses like fraud or mistake.
Remember - after closing marketable title merges into the deed.
Risk of Loss: Buyer must bear risk of loss for any damage or destruction (unless intentionally caused by Seller) suffered to property. The Seller can force the buyer to perform under the contract terms with no ofset or abatement of the purchase price.
NOTE: If Seller collects insurance proceeds to compensate for loss, the Seller must credit the Buyer by that amount
If the buyer dies during the land sale contract, the buyer's estate owes the duty to pay the purchase price (from buyer's personal property) and the buyer's real property devisees/heir will take title to the land.
If the seller dies during the land sale contract, the seller's estate can enforce the contract and the seller's personal property legatees/heirs will receive the purchase price money.
There are two types of deeds on the bar exam: the Quitclaim Deed (which contains no covenants of title) and the Full Warranty or General Warranty Deed (which contains six covenants of title.
Three present covenants: Seisin, Right to Convey, and Encumberances; and three future covenants: Quiet Enjoyment, Warranty, and Further Assurances (see other flashcards for more details on each of these warranties)
Present covenants do not run with the land so that only the grantee who receives the warranty deed can sue for breach of a present covenant.
The future covenants do run with the land so both the grantee who receives the warranty deed and his/her successor grantees can sue for any breach of any future covenant.
Once the borrower defaults, he/she has a limited right to cure the default by paying off the debt before the foreclosure sale occurs. This right is called the equity of reemption.
In some states (minority rule), the right to redeem is available for up to 6 months after the foreclosure sale. (This would not be tru for MBE unless facts provide it)
Senior secured interest holders prevail over all junior interests and the rights of the borrower (subject to borrower's rights to redemption)
If the proceeds of the foreclsoure sale are not sufficient to pay junior interests, their security interests are extinguished and they have no right to any of the sale proceeds. Note, however, a deficiency judgment for any unpaid balance may be imposed on the bborrower.
No deficiency judgments allowed after judicial foreclosure of a purchase-money mortgage of a 1-2 family home on 2.5 acres or less.
No deficiency judgments allowed after a private sale under any deed of trust (purchase money or not) of a 1-2 family home on 2.5 acres of less.
A junior security interest holder is anyone who takes a security interest (except a purchase-money mortgagee) later in time than a prior security interest holder.
NOTE: A junior interest holder also has a right to foreclose if the borrower fails to pay on debt owed to the junior interest holder, but anyone who buys at foreclosure of junior interest will take property subject to the senior interest holder's rights.
Redemption or Lack of Joinder
Like the debtor, a junior interest holder has the right to redeem (pay off debt owed to senior interest holders) to avoid being "wiped out" at foreclosure sale brought by senior interest holders.
All parties with ownership or security interests must be joined as parties to a foreclosure action. The security of any secured party not properly joined will not be affected by the foreclosure. (Lack of Joiner Defense)
If the grantee assumes the mortgage debt, the grantee is personally liable (and the grantor/original borrower is secondarily liable).
If the grantee takes the property subject to the debt, then only the property itself is subject to the debt (but the grantor/original borrower remains personally liable).
To make a voluntary intervivos transfer of title to land, the transferring partyt must use a valid written deed. A written deed is valid if four requirements are met:
1) Identification of the Parties; 2) Identification of the Land (legal description preferred but not required); 3) Words of transfer of title (convey, give, sell, transfer, deed, etc.); 4) Signature of the Grantor
A deed has no effect unless delivered. Delivery requires words or conduct by the grantor demonstrating the grantor's intent to make a present transfer of ownership of the property to the grantee.
Grantor physically gives deed to grantee: If the grantor actually gives a valid deed to the grantee, there is a presumption of valid delivery.
Oral contrary statements admissible to prove no intent to deliver: No delivery exists if the grantor gives the deed to grantee while orally stating the deed has no present effect to transfer ownership.
Oral conditional statements not admissible to prove no intent to deliver: If a ddeed is unconditional on its face, extrinsic (parol) evidence is not admissible to prove the grantor intended the delivery to be efffective only upon the happening of some later event or condition.
Recording Acts (Prop)
Note: in answer RA = Recording Acts; R'ing = Recording; G-or=Grantor; G-ee = Grantee
1) Notice Statute
2) Race Statute
3) Race-Notice Statute
NOTE: Arizona has a Notice type statute
Yes - anyone who pays value of any kind (money, property, services, or even a promise to pay inthe future, or cancellation of an existing debt)
All statutes protect purchasers. Mortgagees for value are purchasers. Donees, heirs and devisees are not protected because they do not give value. A purchaser under a land installment contract is protected only to the extent of the payments made.
Majority Rule: No - because merely obtaining a judgment is not payment of value under the majority rule.
Minority Rule & Arizona: Judgment creditors are protected under Arizona law the same as any other "purchaser."
Note: If the judgment creditor exchanges his judgment for the property it is considered payment for value.
Actual notice: requires evidence the purchaser in fact knew (read, was told, etc.) the prior claim exists. Reason to know is not sufficient for actual notice.
Inquiry notice: requires evidence the purchaser would have discovered the prior claim if they had made a reasonable inspection of the property and made reasonable inquiries based on known info.
Constructive notice: requires evidence in the public records ("grantor-grantee" index) of prior clam that a reas search would have revealed
An easement is a non-possessory interest in land which gives the holder (owner of the dominant land) the right to use the land of another (the owner of the servient land).
An easement holder has the right to use another’s tract of land for a special purpose, but has no other right to possess or enjoy that land. An easement is assumed to be of perpetual duration unless the grant specifically limits the interest.
An easement will be created by necessity if two requirements are met (COSN):
(1) Common Ownership - the dominant and servient land were previously owned by the same party; (2) Strict Necessity - dominant land is landlocked such that there is no other land access to the outside world)
In Arizona, the courts have recognized an easement by necessity when necessary to provide “reasonable access” to property.
Note: If the necessity later disappears, so does the easement by necessity.
CORNPU - three elements
(1) Common Ownership - same as implied by necessity - dominant and servient land were previously owned by the same party; (2) Reasonable Necessity - easement makes access to outside world, water, etc. much more convenient than without it; (3) Prior Use - continuous and visible use by common owner before parcel divided.
(1) Use - the easement holder has a right to make a reas use of the easement
(2) Repair - the easement holder has the right and the obligation to repair the easement if injured or damaged
(3) Transfer - appurtenant easement - cannot be transferred unless transferred w/ the conveyance of the dominant estate; in gross easements can transferred without conveyance of any other property (b/c in gross easements have no dominant land) so long as transfer of easement is for a commercial purpose.
Enjoin Excessive or Unreasonable Use
Excessive or unreasonable use byt easement holder will not terminate easement, but servient owner can get injunction to enjoin the excessive use. For example, the servient owner can enjoin the dominant owner from using easement to benefit property outside of dominant land.
1) Merger
2) Abandonment
3) Release
Note: these are addressed in greater detail on other cards
A long period of nonuse (many years) of the easement plus evidence the easement holder had the intent to abandon (e.g., holder blocked driveway, railroad tore up tracks).
Note: nonuse is not enough - the intent to abandon is key and both must exist
1) Prescription
2) Estoppel
3) Sale to a Bona Fide Purchaser
Note: these are addressed in greater detail on other cards
How is an easement terminated by Estoppel? (Prop)
Note: In answer E = Easement
What are the exceptions toa license being revocable at will? (Prop)
Note: In answer L=License
1) Estoppel - If a license holder invests substantial money or labor in reas reliance on the license, the license will be irrevocable for a reasonable time.
2) Coupled with an Interest - A L is "coupled with an interest" if the L holder has rightful interest to remove or inspect personal property located on land of the licensor. The L will be irrev as long as "interest" lasts. (ex. A buys B's car. Auto located in B's driveway. A has right to enter B's land for reas time suffic to get car.
One must examine whether the restriction on the use the plaintiff is seeking to impose is (1) in writing in the defendant's deed or chain of title and (2) what remedy (damages or injunct relief) the plaintiff is seeking,
Covenants: a writing is req'd & remedy for breach is damages
Equit Serv: writing required & remedy for breach is injunctive.
Implied Recip Serv: No writing req'd; remedy is injunctive
To determine what req'ments must be met, you must identify who is suing whom. 4 possibilities - see page 22 in the lecture notes for this; the text refers to a diagram that uses four parties so it will not make much sense on this card. Be aware of this step when evaluating what must run with the land.
For Covenants, if the benefit or burden must run, there are four requirements. What are they? (Prop)
Note: In answer C=Covenant; D=Defendant
(PINT) a) Privity (horizontal priv of est req'd for burden to run - no priv req'd for benefit to run); b) Intent: C must have been intended to run w/ land. Words like heirs & assigns or similar req'd at CL - today most states infer it if C T&Cs land c) Notice: D must have notice (act, inq, const) of the C; d) Touch & concern the land: benefit and/or burd of C must T&C land. For dom land, C must incr use & enjoyment. For serv land, C must decr use & enjoyment of land.
If benefitted party is seeking injunction to force burdened party to comply w/ terms of covenant, a court will enforce the terms of the covenant as an equitable serv if: a) Touch and Concern (same as covenants on seo card); b) Intent (same as covenants on separate card); c) Notice (same as covenants above)
Note: no horizontal or vertical privity req'd to enforce an equitable servitude
What are the two requirements for an implied reciprocal servitude? (Prop)
Note: in answer Cov=covenant; D=defendant; IRS-implied reciprocal serv; Dev=developer
What are Support Rights? (Prop)
Note: in answer P=plaintiff; D=defendant
What are the three main types of water rights? (Prop)
Note: AZ and few other western states abide by Prior Appropriation which was not covered in the lecture
1) Riparian water rights
2) Percolating water rights
3) Surface water rights
Note: these are all addressed individually on separate cards
Surface water is undesirable. Under thee traditional majority view, the common enemy rule allows an owner to take any protective measures to get rid of the water. There has traditionally been no liability for water damage caused to neighbors.
NOTE: In a growing trend, many jurisdictions prohibit the discharge which would result in unnecessary damage to other’s lands.
A tenancy for years results when lease agreement has expressly stated fixed begininning date & fixed ending date. It could be for a duration of several years, but does not have to be - - could be one month lease, one week lease, or even one day lease. The lease term is the fixed term stated in the lease.
A tenancy for yrs terminates automatically on express ending date...no prior notice to terminate by LL or T req'd.
NOTE: A lease for over one year is subject to the statute of frauds.
Periodic Tenancy (Prop)
Note: in answer PT=Periodic Tenancy
Term: determined just like a term of years - whatever term the lease provides
Terminated? A periodic tenancy is only terminated by giving of proper notice
How much notice must be given? Notice must be given in advance as measured by the length of one period - not to exceed 6 months.
EX: LL & T enter into month-to-month PT. LL or T must give at least one month advance notice to terminate.
EX: LL & T enter into year-to-year PT. LL or T must give at least 6 months notice to terminate
For resiential (ARLTA) leases: only 10 days advance notice is req'd to terminate a week-to-week PT, but one month advance notice is req'd for a month-to-month lease.
For non-residential leases: only one week advance notice req'd to terminate a week-to-week PT, but 10 days notice req'd to terminate a month-to-month lease.
Proper advance notice will terminate lease only at the end of a period. Notice given in the middle pof a period will not termoinate a lease in the middle of a subsequent period, but will be effective to terminate the lease at the end of the subsequent period.
EX: LL & T enter month-to-month periodic lease beginning 6/1. On 9/1, T gives 1-month notice to terminate.Lease terminates on 9/30. If instead T gave one month notice on 9/15, lease terminates on 10/31.
LL has duty to deliver full possession of entire lease premises to T at beginning of lease & T has complete defense to rent oblig. if LL fails to do so.
EX: LL & T enter 1-year apt lease. When T attempts to move in, T discovers X (prev T) still living in apt. T has no oblig to pay rent to LL b/c LL failed to deliver possession to T. (LL has duty to remove prior T)
What three things must a tenant show to assert a constructive eviction has occurred? (Prop)
Note: in answer U&E=use and enjoyment; E=enjoyment
1) a subst interference w/ T's U&E of premises; (lengthy disruptions in utility svcs - no heat in winter, lack of water or electricity) or other serious health safety or E of leasehold defects.; 2) caused by LL; interference w/ U&E must result from something LL did or was resp for (loud noises from other Ts in bldg could be LL's resp if he fails to enforce anti-noise provisions in lease. 3) T moved out w/in reas time. (A T's failure to vacate negates claim that interference suff'ly subst
By statute or case law, every residential lease contains an impliued warranty that premises will be fit for human habitation. If due to viol of local housing code, the T may (after notice to LL & reas time to cure):
a) move out & term. the lease; or b) remain in possession but hold or reduce future rent payments until viol cured; or c) remain and seek damages (for past rent paid and any property damages); or d) repair the viol(s) & deduct cost from next month's rent.
a) Damages include both property and personal injury, including mental distress;
b) For resid leases, maximum deduction from next month's rent is greater of $300 or 1/2 of next month's rent
c) For resid leases, the LL has 5 days to cure housing code viol.s affecting health or safety; 10 days to cure other lease oblig breaches
If the T offers to convey the leasehold back to the LL, and the LL accepts, the lease terminates and the T has no obligation to pay any future rent owed for balance of lease term.
NOTE: If more than one year remains on balance of lease surrendered, the surrender agreement is subject to the statute of frauds - need a signed writing.
T may be able to term the lease and avoid liab for future rent.
AZ Law: T may terminate lease only if damage/destruction substantially impairs enjoyment of leased residence.
a) T leases part of bldg: If T only leased a part of a dam'd/dest'd bldg (one store in shopping ctr), T permitted to term. lease & has no oblig to pay future rent.
b) T leases entire bldg: If T leased entire bldg that was dam'd/dest'd, T cannot term. lease & is not excused from rental oblig.
A lease is a contract and T may assert any applicable contract defenses (e.g., impossibility, frustration of purpose, etc.) to T's rental oblig.s.
AZ LAW: Both LL & T can term. lease if other commits any material breach of the lease (Note - Maj Rule only permits LL to term. if T commits material breach) Also note that under AZ Law, a LL (after filing a complaint & posting bond) can seize & sell the T's pers prop located in leased premises to make up for unpaid rent.
No - the LL is not permitted to use force to regain possession from the T, even if the T's lease expired or the T is in breach of the lease. The LL must bring a judicial action for unlawful detainer to regain possession.
AZ LAW: In resid leases, the LL must seek a forcible entry and detainer (FED) action to remove a T. An FED action for possession may be brought by the LL if rent is 5 days delinquent after LL gives T a written notice to "quit or pay rent."
AZ LAW: In resid leases, the LL must seek a forcible entry and detainer (FED) action to remove a T. An FED action for possession may be brought by the LL if rent is 5 days delinquent after LL gives T a written notice to "quit or pay rent."
If a non-resid AZ lease, once the T is 5 days late on rent or has violated a lease provision, the LL can use self-help (LL can "re-enter and take possession") or can seek an FED action.
It is a T defense to unlawful detainer. If the LL evicted the T in retaliatiion for the T's good faith report of housing code violations, the LL's suit to evict T will be dismissed.
AZ Law: RE is presumed if LL raises rent, reduces services, or terminates tenancy w/in 6 months of a T report of housing code viol to gov't, compaint to LL about breach of any LL obligations, T joining a T's org, or T complaint to gov't about wage-price law violations.
A fixture is a chattel that has been so affixed to land that it has ceased being personal property and has become part of the realty. A fixture passes with ownership of the land.
Absent an agreement by LL & T to the contrary, T may remove fixtures (i.e. T's attached personal property) as long as removal (1) causes no substantial damage; (2) is removed before the lease ends; and (3) as long as any damage caused by the removal is minor.
NOTE: There is a lengthy comparison on pg 31 of thelecture notes to land sale contracts & the intent of owner controlling. It is too long to fit on a card so I note it here in case you think it is worth reviewing.
After a sale of leased prop, new O takes subj to any existing leases (short of finding that new O purch'd w/o act., inq., or const. notice of the tenancy) & will be entitled to all future rent (all rent due & payable as of date of transfer & beyond). New O will be liab to perform all covenants in lease that he/she either expressly assumes or that run w/ lease. Prior O/LL will remain liab to T for any promises made in lease, & to T's assignees for any promises that run w/ lease
What is the Effect of Transfer by Tenant (tested more often than transfer by LL)? (Prop)
Note: in answer cov(s)=covenant(s)
Liabilities & rights of original T and T's transferees depend on whether T assigned or subleased.
Assignment occurs if T transfers entire balance of lease term to transferee.
A Sublease is any T transferee who receives less than entire balance of term. Sub-L is not in priv of K or estate w/ LL so subleasee has no liab to LL for rent or any other cov(s) in lease. Subleasee is in priv of K (& estate) w/ subleasing T & owes that T duty to pay rent & any other obligs in Sub-L ag.
What are an Assignee's Defenses? (Prop)
Note: in answer cov(s)=covenant(s)
Assignee can avoid oblig of orig lease covs by (1) assigning rest of lease to another T (or back to original T); or (2) successfully showing that cov does not run (impossible w/ rent, but may be possible to prove other covs do not touch & concern property or perhaps assignee had no notice.)
NOTE: remember that original T remains liab to original LL for all lease covs b/c they are in priv of K. If assignee fails to pay (absent a novation b/t LL & T to release T), orig T is sec'ily liab.
Original T & original LL will remain liab for covenants in the lease until expressly released.
Assignees of T (& subseq LLs) will be liab for (or have benefit of) promise to pay rent & any other promises in lease that run w/ lease until they assign (sell) to another transferee.
Subleases of T will not be liab to LL for promise to pay rent or any other lease promises
If the lease requires the LL's consent before a transfer by T, the majority rule allows the LL to withhold consent to assignment or sublease for any reason, so long as not violative of constitutional right (i.e., LL cannot withhold consent based on race, nat'l origin, gender, religion of applicant)
Minority/AZ Rule: If lease allows for T to transfer possession only w/ LL's consent, LL's refusal to consent must be reasonable
A fee simple absolute is the largest estate recognized by law. It can be sold, divided, devised or inherited and has an indefinite or potentially indefinite duration. Today, a fee simple is presumed if a conveyance is unqualified.
Ex: "A to B"
Fee Simple Subject to Executory Interest (Prop)
Note: in answer term.s=terminates
If a fee simple estate term.s upon happening of certain event & then passes to 3d party rather than reverting to grantor or giving grantor a right to terminate, 3d party has executory interest. Can be created using durational or conditional language. Ex: O conveys land "to A on condition that (or so long as) liquor is not served on premises w/in next 20 yrs, & if it is, then to C." If A serves liquor w/in next 20 yrs, A's fee interest will automatically term. & title will pass to C.
1) Affirmative Waste
2) Permissive Waste
3) Ameliorative Waste
A future interest created in the grantor following a fee simple determinable.
NOTE: Need not be expressly mentioned in the conveyance. It is always implied when a grantor conveys a fee simple determinable. It is a reversionary future interest - it is transferable, descendible and devisable.
A future interest created in the grantor following a life estate or lease. It arises by operation of law. It does not have to be expressly reserved. A reversion is alienable, devisable and inheritable. Its holder can sue for waste and for tortious damage to the reversionary interest. All reversionary interests are vested and thus not subject to the Rule Against Perpetuities.
A future interest created in a third party (not the grantor) that follows a life estate if created in the same instrument as the life estate.
Ex: O conveys "to A for A's life, then to X." A has a life estate & X has a remainder.
Ex: O conveys land "to A for A's life." The next day, O conveys "all his interest in the land to X" in a 2nd deed. X doies not have a remainder - instead X has O's reversion (in fee simple absolute).
A remainder is vested if conveyed to an ascertained person & not subject to any express condition precedent.
Ex: O conveys land "to A for life, then to B. B has a vested remainder because B is an ascertained person & there are no express condition precedent to taking his interest.
NOTE: if a reaminder is vested, death of remainder holder prior to end of life estate does not terminate remainder. At death, remainder interest becomes part of estate of remainder holder.
No interest in property is valid unless it must vest if at all not later than 21 years after some life in being at the creation of the interest. If there is any possibility that an interest may vest more than 21 years after some life in being the interest is void.
AZ Law: Arizona has a "wait and see" RAP that provides that a nonvested property interest is invalid unless within 500 years after the interest is created it vests or terminates.
1) Joint Tenancy with right of survivorship
2) Tenancy in Common
3) Tenancy by the Entireties
Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship (Prop)
Note: in answer JT= Joint Tenancy or Joint Tenant(s)
Amortgage given by a joint tenant will sever the joint tenancy in a title theory jurisdiction (minority rule) but not in a lien theory jurisdiction (majority rule). Assume the lien theory on the MBE unless the question idicates it is a title theory jurisdiction.
AZ Law: Arizona is a Lien Theory state.
Assume A & B own property in a JT w/ rt of survivorship. A gets a loan from Bank and gives Bank a mortgage on the property. Who owns the property?
In a title theory state, A and B own as tenants in common.
In a lien theory state, A and B own as joint tenants with right of survivorship.
Assume A dies w/o paying off loan. What happens to Bank's mortgage? Does Bank still have a mortgage on property? Yes, in a title lien state, but only on A's 1/2 T in C interest. No in a lien theory state.
A tenancy by the entirety is a marital estate akin to a jt tenancy. In CL jurisdictions, it presumptively (minority rule) arises b/t a husband & wife. Only death, divorce, mutual agreement or execution by a jt creditor of both the husband & wife can sever a tenancy by the entirety. An individual spouse cannot convey or encumber tenancy by the entirety property. A deed or mortgage executed by only one spouse is ineffective.
AZ Law: AZ does not recognize tenancy by the entireties.
a) Possession: all cotenants have equal rights to possess the entire property.
b) Profits, Rents, & Minerals: A cotenant may keep any profits earned from their own efforts running a business on the property (absent ouster), but mujst share any rents received or revenue from minerals or other natural resources taken from land that reduce its value.
c) Expenses: There are two areas for this - Mortgage, repairs and taxes; AND Improvements.
See other flashcards for more detail on the expenses
About this deck
Created: 2011-06-29
Size: 168 flashcards
Views: 172
About StudyBlue
Dennis