Deals with the 4th amend ? exclusionary rule for search and seizure Mapp owns a boarding house Rumors that she?s harboring bombing fugitive Police tell her they want to search her house, she says no Go away, come back, claim they have warrant She grabs it, stuffs down her shirt, police barge in No fugitive, but trunk found motherlode of porn She claims they didn?t have warrant to search house Argument is that the porn should?ve been excluded because no warrant Get protection of exclusionary rule for search and seizure at state level Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Touches on 6th amen (right to council) & 5th (right to remain silent) Pick up guy on robbery, as interrogating, confesses to kidnap & rape Argument was that interrogation was over the top, and asked for lawyer Supreme Court decides that accuses should be aware they have rights Right to remain silent extended to states Cant assume that ppl know their rights, hence Miranda warning 2nd section of 14th amendment does ?remove? 3/5 aspect to representation EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE Nor deny to any person w/in its jurisdiction = protection of the laws Discrimination is not a bad thins ? all laws discriminate We?re not trying to remove disc. From the laws
Want to see the other 1 page(s) in POLS 8 page 2.docx?JOIN TODAY FOR FREE!