Economic Perspectives- Volume 1, Numberl -Summer 1987- Pages 161-178 Tne Economic Revolution in the American South Gavin Wright A s recently as twenty-five years ago, regional economic backwardness in the states of the traditional American South was considered an intractable problem of continuing national concern. Poverty and economic stagnation seemed rooted in Southern culture, the same culture which maintained segregation and traditional race relations. The eminent historian of the South, C. Vann Wood- ward, wrote in 1961: "The modern South rests on these very foundations and is continuous in its economic, political, and racial institutions and doctrines with the order established in 1877... In racial policy, political institutions and industrial philosophy, there has been no break with the founding fathers of the New South" (Woodward, 1961, p. E3). Obviously, much has changed since then. But as the attention of economists has been taken up by new sets of concerns, like energy, inflation, and the competitive position of American manufacturing centers in the Northeast and Midwest, not many have stopped to look back and ask why the perception and reality of the Southern economy has changed so drastically in such a short time. Those who do look back over a longer period often imply that the rise of the South was essentially a long-term process of national convergence in factor prices and per capita incomes; that is, a gradual but reasonably steady reflection of basic economic forces which are relatively well understood by economists.' 'For example, the U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations wrote in 1980: "Since the turn of the century, regional manufacturing wage rates have generally been converging, largely as a result of a slow but steady relative increase in wages in the southeast" (1980, p. 5). See also Weinstein, Gross, and Rees (1985, p. 53), whose per capita income graph creates a striking visual impression of continuous convergence. * Gavin Wright is Professor of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 162 Economic Perspectives Even on its own terms, this level of understanding is unsatisfactory. If regions have converged in recent years, why did they diverge initially? If divergence hap- pened in the past, why should it not happen again in the future? In other words, comprehending the forces of equilibration also means knowing what held these forces at bay for so many years. And a close look at the historical record will show that convergence for the South was not nearly as persistent and unidirectional as modern writers imply. This analysis of Southern economic history is built around the proposition that the region's distinctive culture and economic life were rooted in the regionalization of the labor market. The modern period of equilibration only began in earnest when the institutional foundations of that regional labor market were undermined, largely by federal farm and labor legislation dating from the 1930s. Ironically, the resurgence of the South came in the wake of policies which threatened to cripple the region's industrialization, by forcing up labor costs in low-wage sectors. This apparent paradox calls for a closer look at initial conditions as well as at the regional growth process over the last 50 years. Though it may be the case that Southern wages and incomes were bound to converge to national levels eventually, the path actually taken was a choice of one among several alternative paths to that result. Was there a Southern Economy? The urban specialist Jane Jacobs, in her lively recent polemic Cities and the Wealth of Nations, indicts the economics profession for persisting in "the idea that national economies are useful and salient entities for understanding how economic life works and what its structure may be" (Jacobs, 1984, pp. 29-36). This complaint is, of course, a very old one in the history of economics. But Jacobs means more than the simple observation that factor mobility within countries is imperfect. She holds that the true "salient entities" in economic life are metropolitan centers, which share not only factor supplies but information, techniques, innovations and incremental adapta- tions of all kinds; cities are, in short, the communities of interactive problem-solving which underlie the fundamental process of economic development. Indeed, Jacobs is equally critical of the famous "New South" advocate Henry Grady for thinking in terms of "large, amorphous regional economies" rather than urban centers. Jacobs has identified a crucial set of considerations; nevertheless, the historical record shows that there have been regional and national economies, in both the simple and the more sophisticated senses of the term. In the simpler sense, regionalism in the unskilled labor market is quite evident. Flows of labor were overwhelmingly in an east-west direction, the South remaining isolated from all other regions of the country. During the heyday of European immigration to the United States before World War I, the South was almost untouched; less than 2 percent of the Southern population was foreign-born in 1910. Wage indicators confirm this separation. A convenient Wright 163 2.4 22 ?hio 2.0 - North Carolina 1 .8 Mississippi Wage 1.4- Rates 1.2 -I'\ 0.8 - 1~ 0.6 0 1866 1874 1882 1890 1898 1906 1914 1922 1930 1938 1946 Year Fig. 1. Farm labor wage rates per day in selected states, 1866-1942 (deflated by wholesale price index) measure of a market-determined price of raw labor is the farm wage, which shows no tendency toward convergence before World War II (Figure 1). Both the absolute and relative differentials were higher in the 1920s than at any time since the Civil War. This gap was neither strictly agricultural nor strictly racial. The wages of black and white farm laborers were virtually identical; and the farm labor wage was closely linked to wages in sawmills and textiles, the two largest Southern industries. Textile manufacture in particular employed white labor almost exclusively until the 1960s. It was not just that North-South labor market adjustments were slow; adjust- ments occurred with reasonable speed, but in different directions. East and west converged within the North and South, but North and South did not converge toward each other. These patterns were genuinely regional, not mere aggregations of numer- ous independent local phenomena. In such basic eco-demographic indicators as average farm size and land-labor ratios, for example, every single Southern state moved in the same direction in every single decade between 1880 and 1930-toward smaller farm size and fewer acres per person-trends which were contrary to those prevailing throughout the rest of the country.2 Evidently, Northern and Southern regional labor markets were subject to the same sorts of centripetal forces that characterize physical processes like river drainage and locational processes like the emergence of metropolitan centers. The labor market can be considered a network, and the presence of loyalties among members of kinship, ethnic, and cultural groups gives rise to "network externalities" of the sort that theorists have now begun to analyze (Katz and Shapiro, 1985). Since the cost of using 2There is actually one exception at the state level: Texas, where farm acreage per person increased between 1870 and 1890. There figures reflect the rise of the cattle kingdom in western Texas, not really part of the Southern region by any reasonable historical or economic definition. 164 Economic Perspectives a communication network like a labor market declines as the number of participants rises, this process is an example of increasing returns to scale, in which initial conditions matter even in the long run.3 If this conception is accurate, then the logical place to look for the "causes" of such regionalization is not in overt barriers to mobility at a point in time, but in history. Richard Steckel (1983) has shown that the east-west lines of migration go back to the early nineteenth century and were rooted in certain geo-agricultural continuities, such as familiarity with seeds, crops, livestock, and climate. This "natu- ral" regional separation was ratified and institutionalized by slavery, which served to insulate the South from outside labor flows after 1807, when importation of African slaves ended. Then the region was consumed by the turbulence of war and Recon- struction at the very time when a truly national (non-Southern) labor market was developing elsewhere, lubricated by mass immigration from abroad. Such elements of timing are important because much of the actual flow of information in long-distance industrial labor markets operates though informal channels, such as letters from relatives and word-of-mouth communications within ethnic groups. Statistical studies confirm that the existence of a first wave of migrants from a country is the most important single factor in generating the second wave (Dunleavy 1983). Thus, labor market flows and linkages tend to persist, once begun. Rather than thinking of kinship, ethnic, and linguistic loyalties as market "imperfections," these forces are better considered as part of the way the market functions and expands in particular directions. These directions were in turn reinforced by the recruiting strategies of employers, who found it much cheaper to utilize existing channels or expand them incrementally than to lay out the large fixed cost that would have been required to redirect the established lines of the market. The persistence of a Southern regional labor market is thus both a reflection of and a cause of the persistence of the distinctive Southern regional culture documented by sociologists such as Reed (1983). The South was a quasi nation. Regionalism in the labor market, however, is analytically separable from the persistence of regional wage differentials. International trade theory has long maintained that factor prices can be equalized by commodity flows between nations as well as by migration of the factors themselves. But this effect did not prevail between the South and the rest of the country for two reasons. First, factor-price equalization through commodity flows requires that endowments of trading partners are reasonably similar, so that each one produces some of each major commodity (Helpman and Krugman, 1985, chapter 1). But the South's factor endowment differed from the rest of the United States, especially in the importance of exotic commodities (such as cotton) which could not be grown in the North. The second reason is closely related: Southern resource allocation was determined mainly by international demand. There was no more reason for 3The theoretical implications of increasing returns for technological choices are analyzed by Arthur (1983), and for international trade by Helpman and Krugman (1985). The path-dependent character of increasing-returns processes has been emphasized by David (1975, 1986), as a way of underscoring the crucial role of history in economic life. Economic Revolution in the South 165 Table 1 Nonagricultural wealth owned by state residents as a percentage of total nonagricultural wealth 1880-1920 1880 1900 1920 New England 105 114 122 Middle Atlantic 118 121 125 East north central 90 92 92 West north central 74 66 59 Mountain 44 54 60 Pacific 104 108 112 South 90 84 82 South (excl. Texas) 91 80 73 Alabama 82 72 62 Arkansas 73 67 59 Georgia 88 81 72 Louisiana 114 101 85 Mississippi 84 63 42 North Carolina 94 75 54 South Carolina 87 75 58 Tennessee 90 75 59 Texas 81 107 126 Virginia 97 83 68 Source: Lee, Everett S., et al., Population Redistribution and Economic Growth: United States, 1870-1950. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1957, 729-33. The regional aggregates are weighted averages of state figures. interregional trade to pull Southern wages up to U.S. national norms than for international trade to pull Southern wages down to the levels of countries like India and Egypt. The looming threat of an internal factor-price equalization effect did, however, become increasingly important in American political life after World War I. That development is taken up in a later section. Was the South a Colonial Economy? Like many less developed countries, the post-Civil War South had natural resources and labor, but was short on skills and capital. Aspiring Southern producers usually needed outside help, and over time an ever-growing fraction of the nonagri- cultural wealth of the region came to be owned by "outsiders." This trend, too, was unique among large American regions (Table 1). What set the South apart was not that capital flowed in, but that capital was not quickly followed by flows of people and/or indigenous accumulation, as in the North Central, Mountain, and Pacific regions. 166 Economic Perspectives Southern industries tended to produce a narrow range of cheap, standardized, low-skill commodities, which added relatively little value to the region's raw material. Being subject to outside ownership, and having to go north to buy complex goods made with Southern cloth or lumber or iron, it is understandable that many Southerners came to feel that they were part of a "colonial economy." But those who used this phrase meant more than mere description; they meant that Southern growth was actively suppressed. As one historian wrote: "Profits that might have been re-invested in southern enterprise or helped to stimulate the local economy were drained off to the North. More important, decisions affecting the economic health of the region were made by men in northern boardrooms who had a vested interest in maintaining it in its colonial status" (Hackney, 1972, p. 195).4 Economists who have looked into the subject have found almost no merit in this analysis. The intensive use of natural resources and unskilled labor was, after all, a logical reflection of the region's comparative advantage. The idea that an anti-South- ern conspiracy could have been maintained among business interests across the entire rest of the country is implausible on its face; and the idea that increased inflows of outside capital would damage Southern growth seems utterly fallacious. In the case of the textiles industry, the active encouragement, technical assistance, and financial supplements from the northern-based textile machinery industry helped undermine the competitive position of New England textiles in the national economy. Most economists, therefore, have felt that the "colonial economy" idea confused symptoms with causes, and had little to do with the real reasons for Southern backwardness (Danhof, 1964). A partial exception is the case of the Birmingham steel industry, where slow progress after 1900 has often been attributed to the dominance of U.S. Steel and its notorious "Pittsburgh Plus" pricing formula, whereby the price of steel was based on the distance from the company's Pittsburgh headquarters. As late as the 1950s, these and other related corporate policies were considered major causes of regional stagna- tion by many southerners, including the economist George W. Stocking (1954). But even in this instance the colonialism argument does not work. Whatever U.S. Steel's motives may have been, corporate suppression was not the main reason for slow growth of the Southern iron and steel industry. Indeed, elsewhere in the country the same pricing policies were given credit for encouraging the geographic dispersion of steel production (Warren, 1973, p. 131). After all, local firms have no reason to charge less than the import price; in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, and Michigan, the "price umbrella" provided by the Pittsburgh-plus formula allowed old firms to survive and expand, and new firms to appear and grow. If U.S. Steel had been intent on stifling incipient competition, it would have been better advised to "dump" cheap steel in the relevant areas, as the German steel cartel did in many countries. Instead, their conservatism offered opportunities for competitors, but few responded in the South. The experience of U.S. Steel in Birmingham does, however, illustrate some of the ways in which Southern producers faced problems different than producers in every 4The classic exposition of this interpretation is Woodward (1951, ch. 11). Wright 167 other part of the country. The company poured $23.5 million into improvements and expansion at its Birmingham branch between 1907 and 1913, but encountered a continuing series of problems in labor costs, product quality, and marketing. The labor was inexperienced in industry, and turnover and absenteeism were high; these problems were serious enough to induce U.S. Steel to undertake, begining in 1915, an ambitious program of "welfare capitalism" in an effort to stabilize and improve the work force. Extraction costs were high for iron ore and coal because the mines were underground rather than open-pit, and the terrain irregular and full of seams. Most important, Alabama red hematite ore is relatively low in iron content and unusually high in phosphorus, qualities that raised costs and presented special problems in the technological adaptation (Chapman, 1953, chapters 5 and 6). In other words, the distinctive resource base of the South required adaptations in technology, but the South lacked a strong indigenous community of engineers and mechanics devoted to these tasks. Here is the element of truth in the "colonial economy" thesis, and it is no small matter. From the time of the great innovations of Bessemer and Kelly in the 1850s, the evolution of steel-making technology involved an interactive process of adapting techniques to the peculiarities of national and regional iron ores. The early success of Bessemer (unbeknownst to the inventor) depended on an iron ore unusually low in phosphorus. British, French, German and Belgian ores all shared the high-phosphorus problem, and the efforts at solution led to the Basic Bessemer process by the late 1870s. By perverse fate, the new process required an ore higher in phosphorus content than Birmingham ore. Only the Basic Open Hearth process allowed successful steel-making at the Ensley plant in 1898; even then, economical use required more iron and steel scrap than Birmingham could command. The introduction of the duplex process (an amalgamation of Bessemer and open-hearth principles) in 1906 solved the scale problem, but by that time steel-making in the North had been established for nearly forty years. At every step, the South had to wait for a new technology to emerge somewhere else in the world. U.S. Steel gave Birmingham access to capital and technological expertise, but Birmingham was only one part of a large corporate portfolio of holdings and interests, and not a very typical part at that. U.S. Steel did not have to suppress incipient Southern industrial expansion, but the company may not have appreciated the full potential of its Southern properties. It did not undertake tinplate production there until a three-year engineering study in the 1930s demonstrated that this omission was costing the company $1 million per year! G. W. Stocking suggested that U.S. Steel had been " blinded... to the profit potentialities of its Birmingham properties," and that " / /East South Central 50 ~~--iS~outh Atlantic 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 Year Fig. 3. Per capita income of Southern regions, as percentage of U.S. average, 1880-1985 the 1930s, it is hard to detect a stifling effect (Figure 3). Every part of the South made sustained progress toward the national per capita income norm, with the most dramatic gains made during World War II and the trend continuing through the widely fluctuating national economic circumstances of the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. This regional growth had many components: defense spending, the attraction of the sunbelt, oil and natural gas, the weaknesses of unions and state regulations on business. But when all the "exogenous" developments point in the same direction at the same time, it generally indicates some common background element. The aboli- tion of the low-wage sectors seemed to lift an economic incubus which had held the South down. This simple picture has an element of illusion. In part, convergence in per capita income was simply the effect of low income people moving from South to North. Through the 1950s, the median educational level of black migrants was only 6.6 years. By contrast, migrants into the South were highly educated by Southern standards. (By 1960, more than 35 percent of white males in the South with five or more years of college had been born outside the region.) In terms of employment opportunities, it is not clear that predictions of adverse consequences were wrong. In textiles, for example, employment never returned to its peak of the 1930s. Alternatively, from the standpoint of output, the robustness of Southern industry in the face of higher labor costs reflects the fact that at that historical point the South had a well-developed set of high-wage technologies readily available. To the economic historian taking a view of the South and its political economy in the broadest sense, it appears that a more fundamental transformation was underway, a basic change in the priorities of the region's economic interest groups. One new factor common to the post-war South was the all-out effort to attract business through tax breaks, municipal bonds for plant construction, industrial development corpora- tions, research parks, and expenditures on publicity far beyond other regions. Historian James C. Cobb (1982) called it The Selling of the South. Abolishing the low-wage sectors 174 Economic Perspectives Table 2 Net migration from the South 1870-1880 to 1940-1950 (In thousands) Native Decade White Black 1870-1880 91 -68 1880-1890 - 271 88 1890-1900 - 30 - 185 1900-1910 -69 - 194 1910-1920 -663 - 555 1920-1930 - 704 -903 1930-1940 -558 -408 1940-1950 -866 - 1581 1950-1960 - 234 - 1202 1960-1970 1807 - 1380 1970-1980 3556 206 1980-1985 1810 87 Source: Eldridge, H. T., and D. S. Thomas, Population Redistribution and Economic Growth, Vol. III. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1964, p. 90; Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States to 1970. Washington, DC, pp. 94-95; Kasaida, J. D., M. D. Irwin, and H. L. Hughes, "The South is Still Rising," American Demographics, June 1986, p. 35; Isaac Robinson, "Blacks Move Back to the South," ibid., p. 43. eliminated the vested interest in isolation; once the doors were flung open, the rush of absorption into the national economy was breath-taking. Another Southern historian has written recently: "In 1940 the raison d'etre of Southern state governments was the protection of white supremacy and social stability; thirty years later their central purpose was the promotion of business and industrial development" (Bartley, 1982, p. 160). Though the transformation may have lowered the priority level of white supremacy for the South, the economic costs were concentrated on blacks. The preponderance of blacks laborers in agriculture made this inevitable. But blacks also suffered in other industries. Tobacco manufacturing had long made extensive use of black workers, and the wage increases had dramatic effects. Beginning in the 1930s, the industry began to mechanize the leaf-handling processes which had long been the preserve of black workers, and black employment fell precipitously. In 1930 the industry labor force was 67.9 percent black; by 1960 the share was down to 26.8 percent (Northrup, 1970, pp. 29, 31). Perhaps the single best indicator of the unequal racial impact of the changes in the labor market is the pattern of out-migration (Table 2). During World War I more Southern whites than blacks left the region, but during World War II black out-migration was twice as great. The effects continued through the 1950s, as black teenage employment in lumber and sawmills declined by 74 percent, in the wake of extensions in level and coverage of the federal minimum wage (Cogan, 1982). Wright 175 The overall effect of this history on black Americans is complex, mixed, and ironic. Displacement and suffering were severe. Yet in abolishing the low-wage South, the federal government also destroyed the nation's most powerful bastion of racism and white supremacy. The civil rights movement of the 1960s was able to use the South's hunger for capital inflows as an effective weapon in forcing desegregation.'0 Similarly, migration to the North allowed dramatic increases in incomes and educa- tional opportunities for many blacks; yet the same migration channeled other blacks into the high-unemployment ghettos which if anything have worsened with the passage of time. Implications It would overstate the case to conclude that imposing national labor standards on the South was "the cause" of the economic revolution which has occurred in the region since World War II. Clearly many other long-term developments have had a bearing on these events: transport costs and communications, the mobility of individu- als and corporations, the raw material and energy requirements of industrial produc- tion, and doubtless other factors. But federal labor policy did not retard or discourage economic progress in the South, and indeed appears in retrospect to have been one of the key triggering mechanisms behind the region's participation in these global economic trends. Obviously, policy effects of this sort cannot be utilized repeatedly and may not be predictable with any precision. But those who take the historical view believe that economic life is full of such historically specific equilibra and unique transitions, so that economists who ignore them do so only at their own peril. The particular episode recounted here does have lasting relevance for contem- porary issues. Perhaps the most direct connection is to the ongoing discussions of black economic progress. Before accepting sweeping indictments of black culture and family values, economists should at least be aware that the circumstances under which blacks entered American urban life were different from those of every other ethnic or minority group. It has been pointed out frequently that many other groups faced prejudice, discrimination, and hostility, and yet were successful. But virtually every other group came to American cities because of job opportunities. By contrast, Southern blacks came into cities which already had double-digit black unemploy- ment; where unemployment rates for migrants were in excess of 20, 30 or even 40 percent; and where entry-level jobs for unskilled and uneducated workers had virtually been abolished as a matter of policy. To know this historical background is not the same as knowing what would be right or effective as policy. But the perspective is helpful just the same. The broader set of implications is for the scope of our domain as economists in considering the development process. Factor prices and per capita incomes may well tend to converge among regions and nations. But there is a big difference between 10This thesis is argued most comprehensively in Jacoway and Colburn (1982). 176 Economic Perspectives convergence via absorption into another economy, with massive flows of labor and capital in both directions, and convergence via the establishment of new growth centers with distinct technologies and organizations adapted to local circumstances. Japan is an example of a new growth center, as was the United States in the 19th century; the postwar U.S. South is an example of absorption. Southern history is not a case study in economic development; it is a case of a region being forced from one growth trajectory to another. The new growth path has largely destroyed the South's regionhood. But this effect was not an inevitable by-product of growth itself, but a result of the particular path taken; in effect, a policy decision. Economists tend to think of regional and national loyalties either as pure consumption goods, or as the propaganda of special interest groups looking for subsidies or trying to hold onto a labor supply. From that standpoint, national boundaries or internal divisions appear as market imperfections, barriers to full equilibrium in product and factor markets. Nationhood certainly has this character, but national institutions are also the embodiments of basic community loyalties and values by which people live, and national economies have historically been the carriers of economic progress and the shapers of technology and economic organization. Whether or not capitalist firms are patriotic, their location, property interests and legal/political support made the nation or quasi nation a logical horizon for cost calculations. So which is better, absorption or the establishment of an independent growth center? Is it better to move toward a unified world environment, in which technologi- cal adaptation comes to be unrelated to local resource endowments, or is it better to have a multiplicity of overlapping geographic horizons, reflecting in part the historic national traditions, cultures and loyalties that exist in the world? Clearly, the answer does not lie in a static efficiency calculation at a point in time. And although no general answer may exist at all, clearly the assessment in particular cases cannot be independent of an evaluation of an economy's political legitimacy and culture. Applying such a test, absorption of the South into the national economy was right in this non-Southerner's view, because Southern regional policy was not democratic and denied access to the political process and other fundamental human rights to large portions of its population. This judgment is made easier by the fact that the South was historically part of the country; other cases around the world pose much harder dilemmas. But if reorienting regional and national loyalty is the indirect effect of economic policy, then economists ought to give such matters more explicit attention, even if it means surrendering the fiction that a rigorous efficiency criterion undergirds our advice. m This article draws on research first published in Old South, New South: Revolutions in the Southern Economy Since the Civil War (New York: Basic Books, 1986). The author is grateful to Basic Books for permission to reprint material. For valuable comments on an earlier draft, thanks are due to Gary Saxonhouse, Robert Staiger, and the editors of this Journal. Economic Revolution in the South 177 References Allen, Robert, "The Peculiar Productivity His- tory of American Blast Furnaces, 1840-1913," Journal of Economic History, September 1977, 37, 605-33. Alston, Lee J., and Joseph T. Ferrie, "Labor Cost, Paternalism, and Loyalty in Southern Agri- culture: A Constraint on the Growth of the Welfare State," Journal of Economic History, March 1985, 45, 95-117. Arsenault, Raymond, "The End of the Long Hot Summer: The Air Conditioner and Southern Culture," Journal of Southern History, 1984, 50, 597-628. Arthur, Brian, "Competing Technologies and Lock-in by Historical Small Events: The Dy- namics of Allocation Under Increasing Returns," Center for Economic Policy Research Publication No. 43, Stanford University, 1983. Bartley, Numan, "In Search of the New South: Southern Politics After Reconstruction." In Kutler, Stanley T., and Stanley N. Katz, eds., The Promise of American History. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982. Chapman, H. H. et al., The Iron and Steel In- dustries of the South. University, Alabama: The University of Alabama Press, 1953. Cobb, James C., The Selling of the South: The Southern Crusade for Industrial Development, 1936- 1980. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1982. Cogan, John, "The Decline in Black Teenage Employment: 1950-1970," American Economic Re- view, 1982, 72, 621-38. Danhof, Clarence, "Four Decades of Thought on the South's Economic Problems." In Greenhut, Melvin L., and W. Tate Whitman, eds., Essays in Southern Economic Development. Chapel Hill: Univer- sity of North Carolina Press, 1964. David, Paul, Technical Choice, Innovation, and Economic Growth. New York: Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 1975. David, Paul, "' Understanding the Economics of QWERTY: The Necessity of History." In Parker, William N., ed., History and the Modern Economist. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1986. Dunlevy, James A., "Regional Preferences and Migrant Settlement," Research in Economic History, 1983, 8, 217-252. Field, Alexander, "Land Abundance, Inter- est/Profit Rates, and Nineteenth-Century American and British Technology," Journal of Eco- nomic History, June 1983, 43, 405-459. Hackney, Sheldon, "Origins of the New South in Retrospect," Journal of Southern History, 1972, 38, 191-216. Hayami, Yujiro, and Vernon W. Ruttan, "Factor Prices and Technical Change in Agricul- ture Development: The United States and Japan, 1880-1960," Journal of Political Economy, Septem- ber 1970, 78, 115-41. Helpman, Elhanan and Paul R. Krugman, Market Structure and Forezgn Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985. Jacobs, Jane, Cities and the Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House, 1984. Jacoway, Elizabeth, and David R. Colburn, eds., Southern Businessmen and Desegregation. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1982. James, John, and Jonathan Skinner, "The Resolution of the Labor-Scarcity Paradox," Jour- nal of Economic History, September 1985, 45, 513-540. Johnson, Paul R., The Economics of the Tobacco Industry. New York: Praeger, 1984. Katz, Michael L., and Carl Shapiro, " Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, June 1985, 75, 424-440. Kawagoe, Toshihiko, Keijiro Otsuka, and Yujiro Hayami, " Induced Bias of Technical Change in Agriculture: The United States and Japan, 1880-1980," Journal of Political Economy, June 1986, 94, 523-544. Lieberson, Stanley, "Selective Black Migration from the South: A Historical View." In Bean, Frank D., and W. Packer Fresbie, eds., The Demog- raphy of Racial and Ethnic Groups. New York: Academic Press, 1978. McMath, Robert et al., Engineering the New South: Georgia Tech. 1885-1985. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press, 1985. Northrup, Herbert R., " The Negro in the Tobacco Industry." In Northrup, Herbert R., and Richard L. Rowan, eds., Negro Employment in Southern Industry. Philadelphia: Wharton School of Finance and Commerce, 1970. Reed, John Shelton, Southerners: The Social Psy- chology of Sectionalism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1983. Rosenberg, Nathan, Perspectives on Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976. Rubin, Julius, " The Limits of Agricultural Progress in the Nineteenth Century South," Agri- cultural History, 1975, 49, 385-402. Saxonhouse, Gary, " Technology Choice, Adaptation and the Quality Dimension in the Japanese Cotton Textile Industry." In Ohkawa, K., and Y. Hayami, eds., The Comparative Analysis of Japan and Less Developed Countries. Tokyo: The International Development Center of Japan, 1979. Saxonhouse, Gary, and Gavin Wright, "Two 178 Economic Perspectives Forms of Cheap Labor in Textile History." In Saxonhouse, Gary, and Gavin Wright, eds., Tech- nique, Spirit, and Form in the Making of the Modem Economies: Essays in Honor of William N. Parker. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984a. Saxonhouse, Gary, and Gavin Wright, "Rings and Mules Around the World." In Saxonhouse, Gary, and Gavin Wright, eds., Technique, Spirit, and Form in the Making of the Moderm Economies: Essays in Honor of William N. Parker. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984b. Shiells, Martha, and Gavin Wright, "Night- work as a Labor Market Phenomenon: Southern Textiles in the Interwar Years," Explorations in Economic History, 1983, 20, 331-50. Steckel, Richard H., "The Economic Founda- tions of East-West Migration during the 19th Century," Explorations in Economic History, 1983, 20, 14-36. Stocking, George W., Basing Point Pricing and Regional Development: A Case Study of the Iron and Steel Industry. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1954. Temin, Peter, "Labor Scarcity and the Prob- lem of American Industrial Efficiency in the 1850s," Journal of Economic History, September 1966, 26, 277-98. Topel, Robert H., " Local Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, June 1986, 94, S11 1-S143. United States Advisory Commission on Inter- governmental Relations, Regional Growth: Histori- cal Perspective. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govern- ment Printing Office, 1980. The United States Textile Mill Products In- dustry. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press, 1983. Van Sickle, John V., Planning for the South: An Inquiry into the Economics of Regionalism. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1943. Warren, Kenneth, The American Steel Industry 1850-1970: A Geographical Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973. Weinstein, Bernard L., Harold T. Gross, and John Rees, Regional Growth and Decline in the United States. New York: Praeger, 1985. Whatley, Warren, "Labor for the Picking: the New Deal in the South," Journal of Economic His- tory, December 1983, 43, 905-929. Whatley, Warren, "A History of Mechaniza- tion in the Cotton South: The Institutional Hy- pothesis," Qyarterly Journal of Economics, November 1985, 100, 1191-1215. Woodward, C. Vann, "New South Fraud is Papered by Old South Myth," Washington Post, July 9, 1961. Woodward, C. Vann, Origins of the New South, 1877-1913. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Uni- versity Press, 1951. Wright, Gavin, Old South, New South: Revolutions in the Southern Economy Since the Civil War. New York: Basic Books, 1986.
Want to see the other 19 page(s) in Wright_1987.pdf?JOIN TODAY FOR FREE!